What guidelines do Student Affairs Programs use to prepare for University program reviews?


Summary: The following guidelines were recommended by the Change and Reform Subcommittee to the Strategic Planning Committee. Department reviews include comparisons with peer departments at other universities and specific action plans to improve quality and efficiency. Reviews are analyzed and critiqued by individuals with relevant expertise. Student Affairs programs use these guidelines to prepare for periodic institutional program reviews on seven-year cycles. Click on guidelines to view.
Related Resources:
There are currently no additional resources.


Related Questions:

Is there a Univesity for-credit course on program improvement research or assessment where I can learn how to develop assessment plans and become aware of comprehensive improvement research systems at the university level?
What is CSU’s institutional continuous improvement plan?
Where online can I go to learn more about researching service performance or assessment of programs?
Who is my representative on the student affairs peer-review committee(ARSC)?
How well does CSU do at demonstrating best practices in program improvement research and service performance research?
What are the Action Plan items that were established by my program during the last program review?
What kinds of research evaluation/assessment instruments does CSU use to measure student affairs program performance?
What standards/criteria do the peer-review committee members use to evaluate the quality of improvement research planning?
How well are student affairs and academic programs researching student services performance and student learning university-wide?
How well is my program and others in my division researching student development or program performance?