|
How well does CSU annually organize, systemize, and share continuous improvement information? Summary: CSU’s Academic Programs Assessment and Improvement Committee (APAIC) endorsed a University-wide Plan for Researching Improvement and Supporting Mission (PRISM). CSU developed this concept model to communicate its assessment process to the University community.
PRISM is a comprehensive, systematic process for continuously improving academic programs in three areas: 1) student learning (including undergraduate, and graduate education), 2) faculty research/scholarship, and 3) faculty service/outreach. The process also includes improvement planning for student services and academic support areas. It helps programs coordinate multiple improvement reporting requirements—regional accreditation, specialized accreditation, and CSU program review—while informing CSU strategic planning.
Click on CSU Plan for Researching Improvement and Supporting Mission (PRISM).
|
Related Resources:
There are currently no additional resources.
|
|
Related Questions: What kinds of research evaluation/assessment instruments does CSU use to measure student affairs program performance? What kinds of research evaluation/assessment instruments does CSU use to measure student learning? How well is CSU demonstrating that it makes improvements in student learning? How well does CSU demonstrate continuous improvement and faculty dialogue? Which CSU programs have earned specialized accreditation? How well does CSU research the early perceptions and experiences of incoming first-year freshmen? What kinds of learning demonstrations does CSU require from its students? |
|
