What standards/criteria do the peer-review committee use to evaluate the quality of improvement research planning?


Summary: Each peer-review committee evaluates programs based on an evaluation rubric that describes the quality expected for each planning component. Click on Academic Peer Review Rubric to view the standards.
Related Resources:
There are currently no additional resources.


Related Questions:

Where can I find student success and learning environment data by department level?
What is CSU’s institutional continuous improvement plan?
Who is my college representative on the peer-review committee?
What are the student learning outcomes for general education courses included in the All University Core Curriculum (AUCC)?
How well is CSU demonstrating that it makes improvements in faculty outreach/service?
How well is CSU demonstrating that it makes improvements in faculty research/scholarship?
How well is CSU demonstrating that it makes student learning based improvements?
Where can I find upcoming conferences or workshops that emphasize improvements in student learning or that are accepting presentation proposals on learning research?
Where can I find program-level assessment plans for other institutions in disciplines such as physics, engineering, and others?
Where online can I go to learn more about learning research or assessment of programs?
Are there online examples of learning research being accomplished at the classroom level?
What are the Action Plan items that were established by my program during the last program review?
What kinds of research evaluation/assessment instruments does CSU use to measure student learning?
How well does CSU do at demonstrating best practices in program improvement research and student learning research?
Where can I find department-based summative data useful for program review activities?
How well are academic programs in all colleges researching student learning?
How well is my program and others in my college researching student learning?